Connected Internet - Latest Comments in Time To Be Sneaky!

Re: Time To Be Sneaky!

Articlesgarage.com — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:48:41 -0000

Are these tools still effective these days if we consider how the search engines are claiming?
Or we have no idea how effective they still are? :D

Re: Time To Be Sneaky!

Amanda — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:25:29 -0000

Sounds too good to be true - if you think that Messer Googlieswill give any longevity to these tactics think again.

Can you give us a site example to check the pagewank claims?

Re: Time To Be Sneaky!

Matt — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:39:16 -0000

The critic: you are missing the point with these tools. The sites are not supposed to rank for years. Is just a quick method to make some money. But I don't know how much you can make with a site full of scraped duplicate content...

Re: Time To Be Sneaky!

The Critic — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:45:25 -0000

I wouldn't touch Traffic Equalizer with a ten foot pole. Back in 2005, my bud had 20 sites all running TE... making me $100+ a day in ad revenues.

Then then 2006 came. Google disabled his adsense account and dropped the sites to PR N/A

RSS Equalizer is okay though

Re: Time To Be Sneaky!

Kline — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:55:20 -0000

Some free examples would be more appreciated? The first two are probably a whopping 200 lines of code each. I'm sure most people could write them in an afternoon.... I dont have a problem with 10 dollar scripts, but 80-90 is a range that I get a bit skeptical about the amount of gain i'll see on spam domains. Most of my spam domains (er... if i were to ever dabble in such things) only make like $5/mo each when fully running... so 80 is quite a large hit for something that may be google blocked in amonth or so...

ArticleBot looks to probabbly just use markov to randomize words...