<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Connected Internet - Latest Comments in Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://connectedinternet.disqus.com/</link><description>The latest tech news, reviews and discussion</description><atom:link href="https://connectedinternet.disqus.com/tagging_the_traffic_monster_to_your_site/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:24:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286243</link><description>&lt;p&gt;spam or anything that even resembles it is a sure fire way to get delisted from g or y...you want to take a more traditional approach to backlink building so that it dosnt appear like spam....and you also dont want to build to many links to fast because thats another surefire way to get delisted from g or y &lt;a href="http://earlybirdmessenger.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://earlybirdmessenger.com/"&gt;http://earlybirdmessenger.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">keith watkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:24:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286242</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What I do to get lots of blog backlinks is to join digital point forums and avail of the services of bloggers there who maintain numerous blogs. For $6, they'll post unique articles about you with backlinks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Degree</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:48:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wordpress also offer ping services you just have to write urls of sites that you want ping and after posting their will be automatically pinging. List of main ping services as technocrati may find on Wordpress site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Serg V</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:38:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too bad that all three recommended tools ain't free - paid advertising I guess? No problem with me. I'm looking forward to your next blogearnings report. I hope my three clicks will be mentioned. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stefan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:18:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My mistake i entered Carriage Returns inside 'Less than' and 'Greater than' arrows, and the word disappeared....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@sergio:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I donâ€™t think soâ€¦ it looks like there have been 'Carriage Returns' done at random times through the article. i.e (the first paragraph):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;â€œAfter analyzing many SEO methods, Iâ€™ve come to believe that link building is the most&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;critical, as well as overlooked.â€&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or is just me??? I donâ€™t normally see little mistakes here! It looks exactly the same in Google Reader.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry but a little part in me dies when i see grammatical mistakes :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jezarnold</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:09:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@sergio:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't think so... it looks like there have been  done at random times through the article. i.e (the first paragraph):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"After analyzing many SEO methods, Iâ€™ve come to believe that link building is the most&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;critical, as well as overlooked."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or is just me??? I don't normally see little mistakes here! It looks exactly the same in Google Reader.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry but a little part in me dies when i see grammatical mistakes :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jezarnold</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:05:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ jez: &lt;br&gt;the text i think is aligned as "justified"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sergio</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:54:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286236</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it really works&lt;br&gt;specially the tagging..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thanks for the info about the pinging sites&lt;br&gt;I used &lt;a href="http://pingoat.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="pingoat.com"&gt;pingoat.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;I now know why some of my post did not make it&lt;br&gt;in google indexing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stentorized</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:29:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am newbie blogger. This post some how managed to switch on the ligh on me and gave me hope on making my blogs known in the blogosphere. Kudos.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ronnie ferez</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:41:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"&lt;a href="http://De.licio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="De.licio.us"&gt;De.licio.us&lt;/a&gt; will get you a very powerful backlink"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;delicious links are no follow aren't they - not so powerful&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">winkywonky</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:23:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry.. just to let you know that the formatting in this article is TERRIBLE. found it very difficult to read in gReader&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great article though..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jezarnold</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:44:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, google isn't that fond of reciprocal links. These are devalued.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, when you start a link building campaign, do be aware that forum posting won't yield much PR juice either- most board systems insert the No_Follow code to your sigs. You'll get traffic, but not an increase of SERP or PR.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do agree with article marketing. That method had brought many of my sites to the top 5 search engine rankings&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joseph Plazo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:32:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagging the Traffic Monster to Your Site</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/12/11/tagging-the-traffic-monster-to-your-site/#comment-15286231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You need to add one more line in link building... While linkbuilding is the one that Google loves, you still have to make sure you are not going for any reciprocal link or link exchange methods available online. Best choice is forum posting with signature and article posting with relevant anchor links to your website.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Note: Link exchange may cause negative effects or pages being penalized with G&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Smackall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>