<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Connected Internet - Latest Comments in CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://connectedinternet.disqus.com/</link><description>The latest tech news, reviews and discussion</description><atom:link href="https://connectedinternet.disqus.com/ces_2008_part_3_bloggers_behaving_badly/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:57:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/13/ces-2008-part-3-bloggers-behaving-badly/#comment-15286535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, Shashank, the problem was it was the 'bigger' bloggers at CES that caused the most problems&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kline</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:57:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/13/ces-2008-part-3-bloggers-behaving-badly/#comment-15286534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So are all the bloggers whether beginner or old are allowed at CES. They should've done something to let in only the bloggers with some minimum criteria not all bloggers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shashank</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:50:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/13/ces-2008-part-3-bloggers-behaving-badly/#comment-15286533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The most shocking part is that many of the comments Gizmodo got on this is "positive". People actually find this amusing. I guess the worst part is they are getting a lot of link juice because of this ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dennis BjÃ¸rn Petersen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/13/ces-2008-part-3-bloggers-behaving-badly/#comment-15286532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I would prefer more than a slap on the wrists for those guys.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It appears that just the individual in the gizmodo video will be banned for life from CES, but so far, gizmodo as a whole will be unpunished?  WTF?  I seriously doubt that he was a lone person in this, and that it was done without knowledge of anyone else at gizmodo.  I would slap gizmodo with at least a full out ban on next years CES.  They have enough to cover day to day it wont kill them, but it would show them that this shit isnt cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kline</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:59:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/13/ces-2008-part-3-bloggers-behaving-badly/#comment-15286531</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was funny, maybe! It's an old joke. But kid, think about the consequences. That was just near sided stupidity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Poor guy at the Moto presentation, and the technician guy of this presentation, he might got in really big trouble after the presentation and it wasn't even his fault.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That left a bad taste about Blogger. :(&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way great post, unfortunately there are more idiots who  own the world, just because they have a blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Not a Niche</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:51:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/13/ces-2008-part-3-bloggers-behaving-badly/#comment-15286530</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And those that don't- slap em on the wrists. No matter how fat their adsense cheques are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joseph Plazo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:02:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/13/ces-2008-part-3-bloggers-behaving-badly/#comment-15286529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bloggers be they big names or small ones should behave well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jalaj</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:25:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/13/ces-2008-part-3-bloggers-behaving-badly/#comment-15286528</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I blog a lot and hence consider myself a blogger. Now seeing fellow blogger behave like spoiled Hollywood Celebs makes me feel small when I say Im a blogger.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps they should spend some of their adsense millions on finishing school&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bert</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:28:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/13/ces-2008-part-3-bloggers-behaving-badly/#comment-15286527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I did not mean to lump all bloggers into the same category, but from these stories and many many other incidents, I do not think it is that far of a stretch to assume that bloggers left a bad impression at CES this year.  One could expect it from small time blogs, but it's also the big time ones...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kline</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:06:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/13/ces-2008-part-3-bloggers-behaving-badly/#comment-15286526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of times people will lump "bloggers" into one category. This sucks when some of them behave poorly, it reflects poorly on all of us bloggers.&lt;br&gt;I think it's ridiculous of bloggers to just expect high-priced freebies because they get 500 visitors/day or whatever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Micah</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:14:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CES 2008: Part 3, Bloggers Behaving Badly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/13/ces-2008-part-3-bloggers-behaving-badly/#comment-15286524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree with you.  CES does not allow bloggers to attend as regular press,  but they do have a special 'blogger' category that gets them access to a 'press room' of sorts (only not as fancy) and I'm not sure what kinds of press access they have to press conferences.  However its certainly a step in the right direction, but after the shit pulled this year.. you have to wonder if the show is going to regret doing that, or if it will all just go forgotten next year.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kline</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:41:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>